Replies to post #657392 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[JB3136]

Take from one to give to another

[BBANBOB]

HEY DEAR

AINT if funny when the shoe may be on the OTHER FOOT?????

I mean it is ONLY 3% so WHATS the BIG DEAL RIGHT!!!!!

Tell ya what the big deal is on common holders IT MAY NOW AFFECT THEM and that aint cool, if it is someone ELSE JUST LIVE WITH IT IT AINT NO BIG DEAL, but NOT NOW

Especially when they probably only paid about .25 for each common

HYPO's and not the ones in the ZOO

[SamuraiProgrammer]

I don't know what you mean by 'didn't care if the P's got destroyed'. I never took that stance. I did say that it would have been worth giving up 1% and get 99% now instead of waiting for years more to hopefully get the full 100%. I stand by that.

Also, I have always said that BK remote assets would not follow the 75%/25% distribution plan and I still believe that to be so.

I suspect AG's latest lawsuit is an attempt to get a judge not familiar with the case to rule that 75%/25% is appropriate.

I still don't believe that the POR should affect assets that were NEVER part of the bankruptcy.