4617 f is legal -- as noted by a dozen courts which invoked it to agree to summary judgement (motions to dismiss) all over the country
that you or I think its over reach matters not - the judicial branch acted as if castrated as inteneded
only the one female judge in the $ court even allowed discovery before she ruled on GOV motion for
Even the first three judge circuit panel said motion to dismiss was valid - that their hands were tied
in a too close vote EN BANC we finally found enough judges to say that the actions of FHFA were so insanely wrong that they would intervene and not listen to that part of a law
not for us to say it is illegal when the courts have clearly shown the opposite but in ONE case of dozens so far