Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[chessmaster315]

Correct, Ano.

You posted:

4617 (f)LIMITATION ON COURT ACTION
Except as provided in this section or at the request of the Director, no court may take any action to restrain or affect the exercise of powers or functions of the Agency as a conservator or a receiver.

Not sure how I can make it more clear, “Request” is executive power, “no court can” is executive power thus illegal, 4617(f) has to go, we disagree, but I’m o.k. with that, never mind

4617, above, does not work. I can put a sign up, in my yard,
"Not responsible for accidents".

So, you have an accident and sue me. I point to the sign and say, "not responsible". The court laffs. I can not post a sign that contradicts law, and court jurisdiction.

Otherwise, I could put up a sign in my yard/house: "Selling cocaine on the premisis is permitted with this sign".

Or, I xould put up a sign, "I do not have to comply with local or federal laws".

My sign has little effect. Sure, if you are injured on my property and "buy" the sign so you dont sue, well then its served its purpose. You can voluntarily "comply" but the court is not compelled to comply with "YOUR sign".

In a similar way, the Scotus is "not compelled" to comply with a law that Scotus deems is unconstitutional. Its Scotus who decides "what is constitutional" and what is not, NOT section 4617.