Anders, I don’t agree or disagree with either of you because you two are experts at a different game than me and have the stage here. I don’t know the intimate details of any of these laws, and I believe that you all do much better than I. But I like to ask questions and I am trying to paint the picture that I think a web of questions that seem at times distant but I think in some court somewhere can be interconnected and can be raised. There are many many questions that can be raised, and if the answer is a certain way has consequences and then it also has some sort of implications on the other questions and intent.
The house does not need all or depending on which questions many, answered the wrong way for a lot of people with a lot to lose, to lose and then for the house to tumble down. Then I get back to the pillars side of the debate and in addition to LL, AK and their patrons, you actually have two attorneys and a former CIA turned ambassador at the helm, not to mention a bunch of scientists. So why would anyone of these risk any of these questions when they do not have to? They have integrity, don’t they?
That is the point that I am trying to connect you two on, brothers. And it is a lay POV so forgive the nuances.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
