Obviously you are not going to admit to this being conjecture and your opinion versus treating everything as fact. If someone is a supporter, automatically it is assumed there is an underlying reason for it. Yet on the HGEN board, any paper or comment by anyone is treated as the Holy Grail. How many times has the GM-CSF studies done elsewhere been cited as proof of Lenz effectiveness, yet there are several GM-CSF trials that have failed. There is a reason that the trial sites are being increased for the NIH study, need to increase enrollment to hit P value. See how assumptions work, it can go both ways. Yet no ones goes to the HGEN board to spread assumptions, but!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
