News Focus
News Focus
icon url

P-File

04/08/21 8:23 AM

#333872 RE: rafunrafun #333871

Not based on letters people are receiving in the mail. Just a flat out denial of coverage. The language isn't differentiating between labels.
icon url

zmanindc

04/08/21 8:41 AM

#333874 RE: rafunrafun #333871

Great, I am still covered and I did not believe BCBS would drop V for the reduce-it indication. So that’s the top two carriers basically dropping GV and giving V protected coverage for CVD indication. That takes the insurance company and pharmacy out of potential infringement. So why are we not going up on this news?
icon url

markroth2

04/08/21 8:52 AM

#333879 RE: rafunrafun #333871

RAF, if I am not mistaken this was announced a few months ago and was considered to be a positive for Vascepa. Now we have a couple of new posters present it like it is new!!!! Seems to me like shorts are looking to use this tactic to lower the sentiment on the stock thus to drive the share price down. Very suspicious!!!!!
icon url

HinduKush

04/08/21 9:14 AM

#333885 RE: rafunrafun #333871

I read it wrong --you are right Raf this is a "positive" development (if you can call anything from a health insurer that)--the stocktwits guy was right too: