Replies to post #333514 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[marjac]

Ugh no. Rule 24 states: On timely motion, the court must permit ANYONE to intervene who .....

There is no limiting principle other than satisfying the elements set forth in our moving papers, and as will be further clarified in our Reply Brief. The term ANYONE means ANYONE. Either the proposed Intervenor satisfies the elements, or does not satisfy the elements. Again, under

[north40000]

Your 1 share hypothetical is irrelevant.

Suppose marjac files as exhibits some declarations under 18 USC 1001 from a number of us that I, (name), am a shareholder of Amarin shares, and hold (tens of thousands of shares). I support the Rule 24 and 60 motions filed by (.....).

I am irked by your recent negativity.

[Biobillionair]

What North said. We have sufficient standing in our share count. Now Du needs to care about SC and timing....
BB