Replies to post #332867 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Lemmiwinks]

I admit I did not go into your references of case law to defend such claim. But I trust the said case law that you cited is not arbitrary or obscure. Nor did I search the case law hickma cites to show we as epadi 2 have no standing. The bigger argument gonna win. You seemed pretty sure about rule 24 success. They seem pretty flippant and dismissive that we have no ground to stand on. Their personal attack shows weakness. As this was a 24 reply I would not expect really anything of substance about the rule 60 filing. They just addressing our right. They won’t tip hand with details of the 60 reply in a 24 reply. Is this correct? Others implied the lack of rebuttal to anything in the rule 60 brief was telling but I assume they are dealing with just this one issue at a time. Is this correct?
Oy Vey!!!

[Biobillionair]

Really seems to me like Hikma patent attorneys lack knowledge of ownership, pathetic yet ironic. I take full responsibility for the libel I spew with the TRUTH in this public posting.
LMAO
BB

PS: If this posting becomes some bookmark in a public court case I reserve the copy rights with a fee that exceeds Hikma Market Cap at date of filing

[MateoPaisa]

Thank you