News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HinduKush

04/01/21 8:31 PM

#332654 RE: marjac #332652

Apparently we are all disgruntled investors who have nothing better to do than wait one year to dump a last minute frivolous lawsuit on the defendants. We apparently spent months of painstaking scientific research and obtained experts just to make a frivolous point because we stockholders (who they contend have no legitimate interest!?) have nothing better to do than launch,frivolous allegations.
What conspiracy are we party to exactly Hickma? The eternal conspiracy to tell the Truth?
Oh and shock revelation Marjac objected to the casual use of fish oil which actually is a pet sensitivity of everyone on this board because we are sick of people who don't understand the differences between the different omega 3's calling everything "fish oil" which as we know from our scholar friend Nissen is "stunningly neutral" if not possibly bad for us.
Lets see some rebuttal of the statistical and other major issues please?
icon url

Biobillionair

04/01/21 8:47 PM

#332660 RE: marjac #332652

Defendants' response is par for the course in any type of "David v. Goliath" type fight. Make ad hominem personal attacks on the lawyer, label everything frivolous, and threaten sanctions.



Can I simply ask for Hikma’s paid shills to point out the libel in yellow highlights. Can this be the only response we give?

It’s also funny to be labeled as a “disgruntled shareholder” .... You are a leader in a movement that is seeking scientific justice; Hikma’s paid shills don’t get to go unchecked from justice....or did I miss something from telling the truth in a courtroom?

BB


icon url

Robert C Jonson

04/02/21 8:46 AM

#332735 RE: marjac #332652

It seems like the courts jump on “lack of standing” to avoid ruling on a case. It seems to me that investors, as part owners of their invested company, are indeed a party to any action that affects their investment. Thanks for what you are doing.