"Summon shajandr who specializes in Belgian high rollers."
Nope. I've spent far too/ii/two/to/2 many foggy, rainy, kalt daze in Rixensart and dealing with the Belgian "saisie-contrefaçon" legal process in that never-to-be mentioned-by-me city wherein the EU is HQ'ed.
No sir. The only Belgians I specialise in now are chocolates.
As far as I'm CONcerned, you can keep the whole country, Terrible weather, butt a reasonably decent dairy industry (like Nederlands). And a bunch of old battlefields - if you like to tour in CONstant drizzle and fog. Why did anyone ever fight over this land?
Butt the chocolates are decent. I am knott a fan of chocolate, butt DaSquaw is (as I think most females are). And Da101YearOldMomInLaw is fanatical about chocolates.
Butt I no longer have any use for Belgium, excepting the chocolates as gifts.
As a (former?) lawyer, you might find the entire CONcept of the saisie order quite foreign (pun) to Anglosphere jurisprudence. In a weird way it reminds me of pre-emptive civil forfeiture law in the USA - where can have your vehicle seized if it was used in a drug felony and they keep it impounded until you can work yer way thru the courts to get it back (if you can). I think of it as undue process - or fondue process - anything butt due process.
France has its own variant of saisie orders - BE and FR are both Napoleonic Code countries and their legal systems are waaaay f'ed up, IMO.
Butt the food isn't badd.