~ Biz, Correct' Your DTC Issued ESC Cusips MAINTAIN A Record of your Original WMI Ownership, Specifically "Chosen" As A Participation Outside of the WMI Holding Company's Bankruptcy ~
As I Have Just Now Stipulated to the EXACT Wording, as placed within the WMI Reorganizations ... "Disclosure Statement" ... whether, the wording is being disregarded ?, or misunderstood ?, or purposely twisted ?, ... truly doesn't matter', ... "it is what it is"
My trading account has my original number of shares I purchased; P, K, and U's.
"Correct, the DTC Issued ESC Cusips, are maintaining a record of your original ownership' and your specific "participation" in the WMI Financial Products sold ..."
The CUSIPS have never changed and so I have no indication that my shares have been reduced to a factor dictated by the bankruptcy court to approve plan 7.
"Correct again, as a record to be kept, outside of the WMI Holding Company's BK, now Closed of course' ..."
I expect to receive value for my shares as they appear in my account, which is much greater than the reduced number, meaning the factored number meant to reflect fair and reasonable within the first bk of WAMU bank.
"The interest returns generated and now accumulated"
The original purchased shares, which were always part of the holding company and never part of the bank, are still also registered with the DTC, I'm certain. My broker knows the difference, apparently.
"Absolutely, ..."
I'm expecting to receive value commensurate with a fully valued return on my original purchases made in October of 2008 because my broker has my shares labeled and "escrowed", or whatever, just as they appeared 12.5 years ago.
"Again, the accumulated interest returns, still owed to you, merely restricted while the Holding Company's BK's were still active' ..."
Explain why I'm mistaken please.
"It Appears to me ?, that you are properly on track"