Replies to post #53204 on Integrated Ventures Inc (INTV)

[nwsun]

And what is that scheme?

[bigblue72]

Based on your post I'll be buying a nice chunk today. I've done the exact opposite of what you post and done quite well. For that I thank you.

[CrisTco]

https://fintel.io/doc/sec-intv-integrated-ventures-ex991-2017-october-02-18585-786

You mean this one from 2017? When balance sheet was clean and there was very little operating cash?

https://fintel.io/doc/sec-emsf-ems-find-sc-13d-2016-may-09-18169

Or maybe that one from 2016?

I can appreciate someone wanting to share some true skepticism but empty warnings claiming something without proof are exactly that, empty warnings.

Maybe you got burned on reverse split and you are upset?

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/integrated-ventures-announces-approval-of-reverse-stock-split-300522910.html#:~:text=The%20company's%20common%20stock%20will%20revert%20to%20trading%20under%20its,the%2020%20trading%20day%20period.&text=As%20a%20result%20of%20the,of%20post%2Dsplit%20common%20stock.

It happens, but what you aren't taking into account is that a reverse split with good management opens up the future of a public company.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INTV/security

Please dear god tell me though that the short interest is not 136% of the float for real though, that would just be nasty...

If you aren't happy with your history of this stock though, I would just move on. You aren't helping yourself by sticking around throwing words around like this.

[BartDaddy]

Sellers BEWARE. If anyone is running "The same Scheme" here it is not INTV.

Posts citing out of context information from 5 years ago in an attempt to undermine the reputation of the CEO should be critically examined for bias, accuracy, relevance to the current situation, etc . . . or simply ignored.

Prior attempts were removed from the intro page for good reason.

My opinions only.

[bigblue72]

Hey yaD-Bag520, check the scoreboard.