Replies to post #12868 on IAHL Corporation (IAHL)

[pop-a-top]

Agreed Mr. Ed. The company has made its own bed, but they have a chance to redeem, problem is they put the pressure on themselves when they PR that "we have financials and will soon release", "we plan to list OTCBB shortly", "within 30 days reverse merger to OTCBB" If this company had a history of actually follow through then these past PR's would have had us close to the where the value of this stock should be, well above .03 or so a share.

[RDG013]

LOl Ed, we all have posting records. I look at this as a pink sheet stock and like I would any other pink sheet stock. It surely does not warrant personal attacks against the CEO at this point.

Of course, JMHO

[binzur]

Mr. Ed; "I make nothing personal". You basically called anyone who has posted here that they have talked to Ed Hayter the CEO of IBAC, a lier. "I consider everyone of those posts to be untruthful,that is just imo". That right there made it personal for many quality people who spoke to the CEO of this company and shared that information with this board, myself included. We didn't have to share any of the information but all chose to. Wanted to help the other members of this board have the current updates on information that the CEO has provided via PR.

For that I have been attacked on that "other board". My integrity has been questioned by some here as well. Now that at least 10 people have also posted information it should be obvious that I am not an insider and the CEO of this company does return shareholders phone calls. Maybe its the way you message things that is responsible for you not getting called back!
GLTY
Binzur

[wallymac]

You have a right to state what you know. there is nothing wrong with that. The part that is frustrating and annoying is that you feel the need to repeat it over and over and over again like a broken record. You have had your and no one I have read has protested that what you have stated from the past is true. The problem is the repetitiveness and obvious personal animosity that you feel.

I will say this not only to you but to the many others on this board. If you are looking for transparency, filings and Audited Financials you should not be looking at Pink Sheet Stocks. Yes Ed has stated that the goal is to uplist to the OTCBB and put out AF's but as yet this is still a PINKSHEET stock. From the first day I began trading the word I heard was trade them at your own risk.

Ed's history as well as the History of this company is easily accessible. Pinksheets.com, OTCBB.com, zoominfo.com, The Sectretary of State website. All of it is public knowledge. I knew about Ed Hayter before I bought this stock and still did because I thought it would run. I entered at the wrong price and have averaged down because I believe it will run from this level. Do I think it's a solid long term investment that will make me rich? Of course not.

Anyone looking for a long term investment stock that will pay dividend to their children should not be looking at most penny stock and especially not the Pink Sheet.

That's enough for one night. I'm just getting so tired of the repetitive nature of some of the posts that then cause those that believe every word that Ed says to be true to come to the defense of Ed and the company. It's old and tiresome. As bad as 2 children fighting on the playground. Nothing gets resolved.

My my of resolving this would be to put the history of the company including the Reverse Splits and Ed Hayter's history both good and bad in the IBOX. Then anyone who is interesting in investing can see it and there would be no reason to repost the same stuff over and over and over again. Just my solution but what to I know.

GLTA
Wally