News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MrGoodBuddy

01/09/07 1:28 PM

#239392 RE: Jim Bishop #239388

Ding ding ding... KO punch by ol' JB!!
icon url

S.A.G.

01/09/07 1:35 PM

#239404 RE: Jim Bishop #239388

Stay tuned.
icon url

waltczyk

01/09/07 1:38 PM

#239414 RE: Jim Bishop #239388

JIM - am i right in this assumption

the article was about an affidavit that was prepared days before yesterdays hearing

I was under the impression based on the article ( windsor star ) that this was testified to at the hearing, but that is not necessarily the case?


so its not like the sulja attorneys didn't respond to the affidavit - we just don't know yet?

is this a fair assumption ???

thanks