News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flipper44

01/05/21 5:08 PM

#345110 RE: jammyjames #345109

No, you haven’t, but I’ll show that to you as well.
icon url

flipper44

01/06/21 3:34 PM

#345328 RE: jammyjames #345109

This is what you were trying to limit the damage to in the Optune trial:


....where i personally think novocure are being immoral however is quoting a totally unreliable 5-year survival % -Jimmy James



But then you turn around and state you agree with Dr. Liau and her colleagues (whom I agree with) were essentially correct when it was brought to your attention they said Optune does not work, and it was a poorly designed trial, but you think it just doesn’t work that well.

And here on January 5 you defend the Optune censoring as essentially the same between arms and always fine as long as defined ahead of time.


Then there's no issue so long as the censoring reasons are the same for both arms and the numbers are similar which they more or less seem to be. Also it doesn't matter so much that it's unblinded so long as those reasons for censoring are defined a priori.



You contradict yourself earlier in another post (which I agree with).

The non-equivalent censoring between arms in the novocure trial is a whole different issue (but equally disturbing).



You are all over the map.