I have no problem with it. Why would I? It’s consistent with you being out your money 2 years later with no mention of anything else since. It says there’s this agreement and there is an NDA. I asked you which one the “second transaction” was described in. You declined to answer for obvious reasons.
While they’re speaking of history I’m still waiting to see any time in any sector in any time of history where a business deal went out of its way to call the only transaction in a deal involving a JV was named after the much smaller of the 2 companies forming said JV