Replies to post #110802 on BioAmber Inc (fka BIOAQ)

[Real McCoy]

Nope I meant first time in history.

Your guy is claiming that there is a second transaction protected by NDA, but what it says is that there is a only the stated transaction and an NDA (potentially). So you’d have to have an NDA that includes terms of a second transaction in it. Which of course never has and never would happen.