News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jb92106

12/06/20 8:49 AM

#640792 RE: hotmeat #640788

Hmmm, if that is your take away from Footnote 39 it's no wonder you didn't sign releases.

~jb
icon url

Royal Dude

12/06/20 9:27 AM

#640797 RE: hotmeat #640788

HM, Just more of your legal jargon to confuse and deceive the big Bonds are flowing and the RBS scheme is implementing for 60 bil of misplaced cash.

"Final Terms in relation to Barclays PLC's issue of £400,000,000 1.700 per cent. Reset Notes due 2026 under the Barclays PLC £60,000,000,000 Debt Issuance Programme."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/04/world/europe/bank-england-missing-cash.html

https://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FilingID=14542395&RcvdDate=12/3/2020&CoName=BARCLAYS%20PLC&FormType=424B2&View=html
icon url

mwd44

12/06/20 1:33 PM

#640816 RE: hotmeat #640788

Hotmeat- I re-read the report as you requested. I think it is best I answer your last statement first. You said, "if the retained assets were actual assets the LT, by law, would have had to report them since 2012....Clearly they didn't.

You are correct in saying "clearly they didn't." However, You are incorrect in saying "by law, the LT would have had to report them since 2012."

The retained assets, as with all of the MBSs, are in a trust. By law, when assets are placed in a trust,the trustee assumes temporary ownership and the owner becomes the beneficiary. It is this feature that makes them BK remote.

As it pertains to evaluating the retained assets, I didn't see anywhere in your references where he says he evaluated them. There is a lot of talk about equity being out of the money. However, nothing concerning the evaluation of those particular assets. However, I did see an evaluation of the retained claims. But, as I am sure you know, that is something different.