News Focus
News Focus
Followers 72
Posts 10407
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/30/2006

Re: mwd44 post# 640778

Sunday, 12/06/2020 5:32:54 AM

Sunday, December 06, 2020 5:32:54 AM

Post# of 749756
Footnote 39 as I just showed was about the EC proving to JMW that the seizure of WMB was illegal, it had nothing to do with WMI assets (see pdf pg24 Section A.).

The Retained Assets LG keeps referencing were later investigated starting from Section IX to Section XII....pgs77-348

The document that keeps getting referenced was prior to the Examiner being given access to examine possible Retained Assets as a few paragraphs later clearly states.

The assets were mostly claims against other parties involved, JPM, FDIC, Directors etc rather than actual assets.

In the end the Examiner determined that most were not very valuable, except for the Tax Refunds and Boli/Coli, (read the conclusions) and thus not worth going after.

If the Retained Assets were actual assets the LT, BY LAW, would have had to report them since 2012....clearly they didn't.

The facts don't lie here....reread the Report!!!


2020!!!!!

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today