News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BBANBOB

12/05/20 2:17 PM

#640762 RE: mwd44 #640761

IN COURT it was said

""I am sure all would love to know the value of the assets left over, ALL THEY NEED TO KNOW IS THOSE ASSETS WILL BE THERE FOR THEM TO GO AFTER LATER!!!!""


SO I guess they lie as well

ANd it was said that ANY ASSETS the JPMC wants THEY CAN BUY AT BOOK VALUE

WHat values were attributed the THE ESTATE for the 5th TAKING CASE?

OH and WALRAT set up 3 WELLS accts and INSTRUCTED JPM to take only servicing fees out of those payments and remand the balance to those accounts


BUT BUT BUT WAIT THERE AINT NO MONEY COMING BACK HERE! LMAO
icon url

PickStocks

12/05/20 2:49 PM

#640763 RE: mwd44 #640761

You the examiners report even suckman stated it had been a mistake. The examiner than ask the the court for protection from being sued because the report was only of opinion not fact. The examiner was never given the documents needed so he wrote it based on opinion
icon url

hotmeat

12/05/20 2:54 PM

#640764 RE: mwd44 #640761

Go back and read the Examiners report....later on the "assets" were valued and were deemed to not be valuable. Once more we see how incorrect partial info posted on the board has evolved into being a fact. I suggest you go back to the report and read further down and you will see that the Examiner did value the assets. I know this because I read it myself but as usual I bet you won't even bother to see for yourself.