News Focus
News Focus
icon url

power_forward

01/05/07 7:50 AM

#235906 RE: S.A.G. #235904

"From what I was told"--well, that's your problem right there--the company tells you things and you believe them
icon url

simplyamazing

01/05/07 9:07 AM

#235915 RE: S.A.G. #235904

Airys, with all due respect to your efforts, what makes you think that they would be straight with you if they actually put up lies on paper and broadcasted them to the world? I think I am safe in saying this because even they put up various retractions and in one calling publication of some details a 'mistake'. Putting out nrs costs money, it takes time, should be reviewed by their own lawyers - so with so much diligence behind them there is no such thing as a 'mistake' when you spell out details that are not true. If they had the ballz to lie to the world I don't see how you can think that they'll be more honest with an individual. I hope you are right but I don't think there is really nothing preventing them to put up any information before the OSC hearing - especially any financials since they are not in the allegations. Jan 8 will come and go and we'll still be hanging on for some news that we hope will be positive.
icon url

Anticipating

01/05/07 9:51 AM

#235949 RE: S.A.G. #235904

Nobody has been charged yet! It's a only a hearing
icon url

bonniesuzi

01/05/07 10:16 PM

#236593 RE: S.A.G. #235904

What about the RCMP? I thought they asked PV a thing or 2.