News Focus
News Focus
icon url

anders2211

11/04/20 5:44 PM

#326305 RE: Sojourner55 #326300

100% agree

Perhaps they did not know exactly when they were ready and registered with both and SNO was already more the backup if delay.

icon url

Poor Man -

11/04/20 5:56 PM

#326308 RE: Sojourner55 #326300

And I’ll add, it was simply too long of a stretch between having TLD in hand and waiting for SNO. Just nothing to be gained by dragging this out.

“Its likely they registered both SNO and SITC as placeholder as part of strategy to decide when to release TLD. I've always thought the 10 minute at SNO was insufficient to elaborate on a 13 year trial and deep dive into results.”
icon url

juslin

11/04/20 7:54 PM

#326381 RE: Sojourner55 #326300

SITC is a one hour presentation? I cant see why they need one hour to present a failed trial. Can someone confirm the one hour presentation?
icon url

hankmanhub

11/04/20 11:00 PM

#326443 RE: Sojourner55 #326300

Which of the two events, SNO or SITC, is the more prestigious? To my way of thinking a plenary presentation to the entire conference would be far superior to a simple poster on the wall that many may never see without a live presentation at all. Why??