Senti, totally agree. In my readings yesterday saw estimated (maybe actual) survival as low as 3.5% - this in published papers from 2017 to 2019 so may include temodor. This study should be a winner and good improvement for patients even though it probably does not help all it at least does wonderful things for some Good luck
If those theoretical 48 patients alive for 60 months were all treatment, as pointed out, that’s almost 21% alive for 5 years. If there were 0 control patients alive for that same time period, that would be a huge indicator of efficacy, IMO.
Moreover, as it stands, over the course of 20 months - 20 treatment patients died - all occurring after the 36 month part - hmmmmm ....
and all extrapolated from TWO data points past the 36 month point ....
Again - 20 treatment dead in 20 months - all after the 36 month point .....