I went into the Kaplan Meyer table and there was a lot of change between 40 and 45 months so I averaged the surviving fraction at 40 and 45 months and the surviving fraction was .315 and .274 respectively which when multiplied by the N of the experimental group came out to 68.3 averaged between the 40 and 45 month mark.So since you can’t have a .3 of a person I would say 68 alive at that interval between 40 to 45 months.
For the 60 month time. According to the Kaplan Meyer table there was .201 surviving fraction Which times 232 which was the N of the experimental arm equals 47.8 “people alive”. Therefore rounding that up gives you 48.
So I would say that your numbers are consistent with the Kaplan-Meier curve.
Also It was pointed out to me that In My seeking Alpha blog, I had had some miss spellings that I corrected, and when I edited the blog they pulled it down for review. So I don’t know if it’s going to be put back up. If it comes in with a different different link I will submit the new link.
Also it is important to note that anything past 36 months on the KM curves have very limited data points. Basically only 2 data points given in the Translational Med Article.
Also please note the lower and upper standard error ranges. Sorry for the formatting I couldn't get it to format better.
Total observed Total failed Total censored 232 158 74