News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Cardiologymd

09/08/20 10:25 AM

#297372 RE: Albino2 #297370

I agree
But don’t sue doctors. Nothing to do with the switch
Sue insurances. Nothing to lose except for legal fees.
icon url

dmiller

09/08/20 10:33 AM

#297376 RE: Albino2 #297370

Writing Off Label scripts is entirely legal. Talk about pissing into the wind. These posts wreak of desperation.

I have heard it stated that Amarin can't sue doctors and insurance companies because they just can't afford to risk their reputation etc. But as a one drug company with nothing to lose in the US why not? Why not sue everyone every time? BP may even back the effort since they lose out all the time and have legitimate reasons why they can't afford the reputation risk. But Amarin literally has nothing to lose by suing every one who prescribes off label or pharmacies that switch off label.

icon url

HinduKush

09/08/20 10:45 AM

#297380 RE: Albino2 #297370

Albino,
It may be more effective for Amrn to go after the enabler rather than the ipso facto effectors that utilized a "door open" legal prescription remedy ultimately for the "patient's" economic and health benefit..
HK
icon url

Crikker

09/08/20 5:02 PM

#297490 RE: Albino2 #297370

I'm just wondering if it is state law the requires that the generic be substituted is it not the state law the is inducing infringement of the RI patents? Can the states be sued for inducing infringement?