I am interested in what factors have persuaded you to come to predicting a 20% chance of success.
Are you skeptical of the theory of Anavex's case for 2-73 across CNS diseases? (If so, why?)
Are you concerned with imprecision in trial design measurements that would hurt the p value?
Has your experience to date with so many biotech failures led you to believe this will also likely fail to achieve a p of less than .05 for the primary endpoint and the secondary sleep endpoint?
Reposting questions for Doc328. I assume they were overlooked:
Doc,
I am interested in what factors have persuaded you to come to predicting a 20% chance of success.
Are you skeptical of the theory of Anavex's case for 2-73 across CNS diseases? (If so, why?)
Are you concerned with imprecision in trial design measurements that would hurt the p value?
Has your experience to date with so many biotech failures led you to believe this will also likely fail to achieve a p of less than .05 for the primary endpoint and the secondary sleep endpoint?