It's not a false post. Here's what the judge ruled:
Defendants' motions for sanctions 28 32 are denied for lack of good cause
This is in document 32:
As demonstrated in the defendants’ May 14, 2020 motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [ECF Doc. 27], the plaintiffs brought this action without advising the Court that they are Marijuana Related Businesses.
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON LACK OF JURISDICTION IN WRITING AND THE CASE IS STAYED UNTIL THEN.
[/color]
um the federal court has jurisdiction in calif....now if it was a state court it wouldnt...j.c. is so funny...oh i can steal legally! lololozzzzzzzzzzzzz he is toast and too stupid and arrogant to know it...i laugh at him..i spit at him...case moving foward