see my prior post - if the shares were sold into the market and not just shares from which the restriction was lifted because of the passage of time, then they do have explaining to do.
Again, I haven't beeen able to follow all the exchanges between HOG, Airys and the company, as well as the commentary, and the commentary on the commentary, etc., etc., etc.. Are they being precise with the terms? These are serious allegations and we do need and should get precision.
I'm sure most here want the answers, whether they are positive or negative.