InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

binzur

12/16/06 4:43 PM

#218936 RE: MarionPolk #218934

Or land in Colchester!
icon url

bikerider99

12/16/06 4:45 PM

#218938 RE: MarionPolk #218934

so you say they naked shorted the 100mil?
icon url

rrufff

12/16/06 4:49 PM

#218941 RE: MarionPolk #218934

Again, not disagreeing with your post but the real issue is whether or not they sold unregistered shares, with no qualifying exemption to the public. Clearly, there needs to be an explanation.

I would imagine that Petar and company read this board. If they do, they have a choice, and that's been what many of us sporadic posters have said many times, "show us the money, all of it," as promised or face the consequences. If shares were sold for personal gain during the periods of PR's, they sure as hell better be buying them back very quickly and, then making sure that all businesses PR'd to be in the public entity are in the public entity. (As posted many times, that's not to defend the company in any way and just my opinion.)

We don't have the answers, we want and deserve the answers. But, again, let's be precise and to the point rather than all over the place with opinions posted as factual.
icon url

justfactsplease

12/16/06 5:14 PM

#218964 RE: MarionPolk #218934

Marion, what countries can they send the money to and not have it recovered. Just wondering, can they cut a deal with a hedge fund, in say Dubai, and get commisions/kick back to a company set up as a business there?