Replies to post #990 on Hemi Energy Group Inc. (fka HMGP)

[lowman]

Though the answer to your question is...no, don't be disappointed. Keith has made it known to me, he feels the expense is not justified, and a considerable expense, it is. So much so, the same expense could be invested into leases that in truth, become assets...something an uplisting cannot be considered. If the same expense went to a lease, as opposed to an uplisting, atleast the lease can yield true, realized monetary gain, while an uplisting can only yield, true realized burden.

Since it is Keith's design to build an asset rich company, and it's obvious he is doing just that (and quite nicely, I might add), all the more for shareholders, when Keith begins to entertain a buyout from a Big Fish.

[lowman]

Also, disappointing as my last post may be, consider the difference between a CEO who says 'NO' (to uplistings)right up front, and the CEO who forever 'dangles that carrot' before the shareholder's eyes.

Seldom does a pinkie uplist anyhow, but often do they lead us on to believing it is 'just around the corner'.

I can fully appreciate Keith's position when he is upfront and honest. I would rather never hear him say a word about uplisting, and surprise us one day by opening on the OTCBB, than to hear 'sweet words' that never come to be.