News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1292
Posts 45942
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/16/2005

Re: themetallurgist post# 990

Saturday, 12/16/2006 1:05:30 AM

Saturday, December 16, 2006 1:05:30 AM

Post# of 51429
Though the answer to your question is...no, don't be disappointed. Keith has made it known to me, he feels the expense is not justified, and a considerable expense, it is. So much so, the same expense could be invested into leases that in truth, become assets...something an uplisting cannot be considered. If the same expense went to a lease, as opposed to an uplisting, atleast the lease can yield true, realized monetary gain, while an uplisting can only yield, true realized burden.

Since it is Keith's design to build an asset rich company, and it's obvious he is doing just that (and quite nicely, I might add), all the more for shareholders, when Keith begins to entertain a buyout from a Big Fish.

L~



"took me 3 long years to make a million bucks over night"

For first alerts, join my IHub email list: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/chairmail_sub.asp?board_id=5935

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today