News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Eternal101

05/28/20 12:33 AM

#51237 RE: fivexshot #51235

Mywo is a VATE investor but have met Ryan M few times in person and updated the board. May be he can shed some light if has any info.

If the 42M O/S instead of 2M is true, then it is outright a scam.

I would wait for some clarity. Never saw anything about any of VATE preferred shared excluded from reverse split in any filings.

If the 42M O/S is true, I would join any CA suit by other investors.

Have anyone who invests/trades for long time in OTC seen stocks doing reverse split to common stock but not other stocks?
icon url

RookieStockPicker

05/28/20 1:58 AM

#51239 RE: fivexshot #51235

So a Suprise Reverse Split FU to shareholders might not be enough. After all Medico wanted to maintain OTCQB status.
icon url

Pacha78

05/28/20 5:50 AM

#51243 RE: fivexshot #51235

Falsified statements, misleading investors will help build our case against him.


icon url

carp302

05/28/20 7:54 AM

#51247 RE: fivexshot #51235

Thanks fiveshot. How long did it take for you to collect your money and what was the percentage you received back if you don’t mind me asking?
icon url

justhefax

05/28/20 8:51 AM

#51253 RE: fivexshot #51235

well close...

1) Was there fraud / deception?
If yes, they have to be listed.

> the lack or authentic shareholder notification = deception?


2) Can intent "willfulness" be attached to said allegations??

> i think that is evident on its face


but i am not an atty