Replies to post #274379 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Meowza]

That might be fair if he were less pompously dismissive of the rest of the board discussion.

I hope the real issue with burden of proof has been made plain enough, now that you're saying to lay off him.

The Judge doesn't have prerogative to misrepresent expert testimony. And it's not the best way to adjudicate a patent's obviousness, hence objective indicia.

Breath claims we need to accord Judge Du's errors of fact with deference to anything less than clearly erroneous, but appeal is postured on questions of law. I'm baffled why Breath can't accept that. And no such deference was shown by Judge Du to USPTO decisions, or FDA contemporaneous understanding of trig drugs and EPA in hypertrig patients.

We need to take Mori with other prior art, whatever that means (no elaboration provided).

...I'm all for a variety of perspective, and I wish Breath provided that. Maybe he'll read the studies, opinions, briefs and other resources provided by other posters, one of my favorite benefits of joining this board.

[The Irishman]

Lay off?
I won’t speak to any accusations or insults. Yet, I will speak to our new friend’s evolving or ever changing demeanor.
You are correct. Board posters are entitled to their opinion. However, as I stated in my earlier communication, our new friend seems to be playing the role of antagonist, moderator and devil’s advocate. Yet, when you look at the earlier posts, they seems to be an Amarin Champion.
So, my question to him/her was simple, what is your intent? What is your motivation as it relates to your board input? Your purpose, essentially.
I think it’s a fair question. It’s not really intrusive.
If it’s pure, then say so. If not, then be gone with him. We don’t need unproductive forces or contributors on our little chat.

Be well

[breathofthenightwind]

“His point is a bit similar to hdg point: legal obvious is not equal to scientific proving. “

Yes, that pretty well summarizes most of what I said here.