Replies to post #274351 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Lemmiwinks]

And it was overwhelming that it did not. Read the singer brief if ya have not. Come back with something meaningful unless ya short. Actually either way. Come back with something meaningful. I’m not too stubborn to cut my losses after the windfall at buying at $4.02 but V is gold. AMRN just does not have ANY Irish luck.

[Meowza]

As long as you continue substituting the issues people are actually raising (e.g. shifting burden of proof) with issues you are comfortable combating (whether burden of proof may be met holistically or must be met piecemeal), I agree this won't be productive.

I do owe you a thanks for clarifying your remarks about Mori, I misremembered the your first post I responded to. And it seems we agree to an extent that Mori doesn't suggest EPA is benign to LDL--but, what is this other prior art you're referencing?

That still leaves the other points about what Mori actually says, and the other positions you've staked and abandoned without explanation. Which is fine, it's just an internet forum.

[invest2992]

Buttheadinthenight. the law places the burden on those challenging the patents to prove their case in a clear and convincing manner. If you've read most of the cases and commentaries that have been cited on this site since about mid march when speculation as to the outcome of the trial started in earnest with the Markham blogs you would have picked that up.