Unless I'm missing something, the game should be over with this:
The District Court Improperly Shifted the Burden to Amarin to Prove Non-Obviousness and then Erred in Ignoring the Evidence Amarin Presented Without clear and convincing evidence in the record, the only way the Court reached its obviousness conclusion was by shifting the burden to Amarin to show non-obviousness. Instead of requiring Defendants to show that a skilled artisan would have reasonably expected Mori’s findings to be applicable to severe hypertriglyceridemia patients, the district court improperly required Amarin to show the opposite