News Focus
News Focus
icon url

postes

05/16/20 6:55 PM

#274128 RE: Bill B #274121

Bill B...here! Here!
icon url

kevin1231

05/16/20 7:09 PM

#274131 RE: Bill B #274121

Agreed.
icon url

jessellivermore

05/16/20 7:33 PM

#274136 RE: Bill B #274121

Quote:
"This entire speculation on her state of mind is unseemly I believe and I find dredging up her personal life in pursuit of a benefit to amarin repulsive"

Sorry you think I am repulsive.

What I find repulsive is when a judge dismisses perfectly sound arguments and bases her verdict on factual errors..

":>) JL
icon url

marjac

05/16/20 8:58 PM

#274149 RE: Bill B #274121

It is not unseemly in the least. The AMRN shares lost 70% of their value, and $3.4 Billion of market cap due to her abject dereliction of judicial duty. Lives were destroyed.

If there is something nefarious or inappropriate that occurred, then at minimum, any aggrieved person can file a complaint against Judge Du on grounds of judicial misconduct or DISABILITY. (emphasis added).

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view_jm.php?pk_id=0000000895

Above is the 9th Circuit link (Du is subject to jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit). The Complaint CANNOT just express sour grapes over her decision, while guessing what went on in the judge's mind.

However, a well-written, tailored complaint arguing that due to these circumstances, she was disabled, might, and I emphasize might, have merit.

I have not looked at the evidence that closely to opine with authority on the actual merits, but I can absolutely opine with uncertainty that exploring these issues and looking at the evidence, is neither unseemly nor devoid of merit. Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has a procedure in place for precisely exploring these issues.

I am going to review the evidence, and now having seen this available procedure, I might even consider filing the complaint myself, if there is enough merit to the underlying evidence. This cannot overturn what she has done, but may be a way of at least holding her accountable, and could even disqualify her from presiding over a successful appeal where the Federal Circuit remands back to the District Court.