Please explain how you think that works. The warrants were a hedge that shorts could use to safely short the shares and profit with no risk at any price above the warrant strike price on warrants that they held. Nobody could short against anybody else's warrants, especially not against the warrants that Linda held. I'm very curious to know just what mechanism you believe makes this play by Linda beneficial to anybody but herself vs her having to put up more cash to extend her warrants for a year like any other warrant holder had to, or else for the warrants just to evaporate eliminating any claim for 29M shares any time if and when the stock gets above the warrant strike price.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
