Thanks. At the hearing they asked Hudnell about a step to verify callee and match with the caller to complete call; whether this step is a black box or software or hardware. The defense said this step was not explained in the claim. That prompted questions from the bench. Hudnell answers were not clear. An old guy repeated "abstract over abstract..." giving the impression already made up their mind, not giving enough time to explain.
If patents in the second appeal do not explain well, if the same bench comes again, what will they do?
Hope the Congress acts quickly and force lawyers to rely USPTO and PTAB and not re-invent.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
