Replies to post #90523 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[DeerBalls]

$.0125. I think it is important to remember: 1) The filings are where these cases are won/lost; Mr. Hudnell didn't produce the filing. 2) Mr. Hudnell was stuck having to argue another's "playbook". 3) Mr. Hudnell came onboard with VPLM knowing the situation. He came onboard risking his resume! 4) It's his playbook going forward!

I think this setback could actually turn as a blessing in disguise. This was a true wakeup call for VPLM and my guess is there are actions which went immediately into play. The stock just isn't trading like I thought it might with a lost! We will see.

[BigRaj]

I think the case made from hudnell was much stronger in the 2nd appeal, and he should be more prepared to answer questions because he wrote the argument.

This first appeal he took over with not much time to prepare, and it was obvious during the oral argument.

But this is a prime example of why congress needs to act, because lawyers, and judges that are 80 years old have no business deciding rulings about new age technology that was unimaginable when they were younger.

They should rely on the trained experts at the USPTO.

The courts should only be there to determine if infringement is happening.