Shareholder communication not being their strongest suit is certainly an understatement!
However, I can understand their reticence in communicating their plans and/or issuing shareholder advisories as it would just get “slammed” by those who have “no interest” to see the success of the NWBO trials and PRs spun every which way.
As some of the posters who have migrated from YMB recall, I had a pretty prolonged exchange with a “financial expert” on the disclaimers every time NWBO put out a PR. These were just boilerplate sub-clauses contained in the Forward Looking Statements section of their PRs....but they proceeded to “cut and paste” this sub clause saying that they could not even “guarantee” what they have released and used that “lack of conviction” as a Headline to their posts / articles. Headline grabbing and sensational but purely meant to distort. Proceeding then to walk the price down.... proclaiming proudly...Mr. Market has spoken underscoring their assertion!
After I had “cut and pasted” other similar disclaimer sub-clauses contained in BP’s PRs.....the thread quietly tapered off!
Sure, we shareholders have a RIGHT to timely and regular communication by management but I believe that in the current “hostile environment” that NWBO management is facing, adopting a “cone of silence” (that phrase would date me) is the right strategy and strongly believe that what is “good for the goose would also be good for the gander”!
GLTALs
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
