They imply they would capture a very large share of a market that is people taking V not people takin V for only 12 weeks. Thus they are implying inducement or the market estimated should reflect only short term V scripts.
HDG, thanks. I see you’re in agreement with KCSVEN. I am just your average Joe that interprets it differently. Maybe I want to see something that isn’t there. Why do you suppose they put those numbers there? To me it’s because they want people to know the potential value of the market currently available for their generic version of V. It appears as an admission that they intend for infringement to impact some/much of the stated current market. Thanks for your educated reply and input. I hold your opinions very highly so I’m probably in error but I can’t change the way I see it. No need to continue to debate this. I’ll assume you and KCSVEN are correct but I hope you are both wrong.