News Focus
News Focus
icon url

msskinny

12/05/06 3:37 PM

#204572 RE: S.A.G. #204566

Ok - stating the obvious - if Petar has "no control" of the situation, why does it matter what Petar says about AF's, auditors, business deals, etc, etc, etc?
icon url

jean1057

12/05/06 3:38 PM

#204573 RE: S.A.G. #204566

HOME DEPOT would have taken them out..if that figure you state had any credibility..you have been there..did that look like a
n "2004, the company did 23.5 million in sales." company..why would they buy another mom and pop shop for a mere 500k..if they had that kind of revenues..??
c'mon you sound more and more like Petar..sorry to say that..but stop it while you are ahead..its becoming frightening..after all
your "work" over the weekend...you play with your credit here..JMHO
icon url

gdb81

12/05/06 3:39 PM

#204576 RE: S.A.G. #204566

If he doesn't use those allocations, he could lose them. So what did he do? He simply gave them to Sulja. Basically, he awarded those allocations to Sulja, which gives us the opportunity to make $1.00 per metric ton. He doesn't make a dime, it's all ours.

What a nice guy, he gave away all that for free, presumably because he likes sulja and the shareholders so much. He just doesn't show it, you know.
icon url

ed53wa

12/05/06 3:40 PM

#204579 RE: S.A.G. #204566

Airys-that's good to know! I'm sure things will keep coming back to you. A lot to absorb I'd imagine. Thanks
icon url

jk21

12/05/06 3:41 PM

#204581 RE: S.A.G. #204566

all this is good, and starting to make sense, but he has zero credibility as far as i'm concerned. i'm not opposed to him staying with the company as the deal maker (assuming it's all on the up and up), and I hope he does because he seems to have the connections. however, he clearly lied to us before. and the investors need more than words. they need a stamp.
icon url

abbam

12/05/06 3:44 PM

#204587 RE: S.A.G. #204566

tell petar to buy some stock in sulja so he can profit and not be so chartieable. what a nice guy he is
icon url

boogaloo

12/05/06 4:46 PM

#204702 RE: S.A.G. #204566

Airys, Do you mean in 2005 (not 2004)? em