News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JJPow

12/15/19 6:20 PM

#234253 RE: Jamaalish #234248

Jamaalish you can keep posting anecdotal reviews that have absolutely no scientific basis all night long , but you still won’t have proven your statement- so why bother?
icon url

dukesking

12/15/19 6:28 PM

#234261 RE: Jamaalish #234248

Jamaalish, I’m sure some of the reviewers had a sincere complaint that may or may not have had anything to do with Vascepa. These are the least believable and least credible, non scientific, unregulated opinions and FUD available for DD when it comes to Vascepa or any other product. They hold no value for me, for all the obvious reasons. JMO
icon url

oneragman

12/15/19 8:13 PM

#234296 RE: Jamaalish #234248

Jam, more likely than not from competitors looking to confuse people who are researching the drug. Three very immediate family members who take it and no issues, but what I really look at is the over 8000 patient 5 year RI study. If there were issues, we would have heard about them there. What came out of it was the term "placebo like side-effects".