Replies to post #66216 on Lans Holdings Inc (fka LAHO)

[ysung]

Yup !

Why bother to take over LAHO debt ?

[H~E Pennypacker]

Why even bring LAHO in at all then? Why didn’t these people just move into a new shell and leave LAHOs debt and commons behind and start fresh?

Could it be that they paid Lans' debt in order to have them cancel the original LOI?

I want to believe that we're going to be made whole here- it just doesn't make sense to me that we will.

[getmoney12]

I think with the debt being erased, the intentions aren't to let laho die. I hope we are still connected to gscg,because that's why I invested, but I'll be happy enough if laho reregisters debt free and maybe can move forward. The name is known in the the market well at this point

[tdbowieknife]

To make it look "legal". And what comes with debt is convertible shares. Sometimes these penny stock crooks make up debt just to dole out shares to each other.

.

[Hookmeistr]

I believe the reason we're along for the ride is multi-part. First, the binding LOI required we be included. Second, I believe the relationship between Benito Novez and Dave Christensen has something to do with it and finally because GSCG wouldn't want to spoil their clean reputation by doing something so 'scammy' in nature. This would tie them up in litigation and at great expense. Why would they want to risk this? There isn't anywhere near enough upside to risk something so egregious.