Replies to post #230672 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[oneragman]

Will, I disagree. I love that AMRN doesn't own plants. I would compare AMRN to a designer in the textile trade. The designer owns the name. Contracts out all production and distribution. They also make the lions share of the profits. People buy Ralph Lauren for the name/designs and people will pay a premium for that. They could care less how or where it is made or if RL owns the plants. Actually, AMRN's even better...they don't have to own/lease store fronts. Less is more in this instance as far as I am concerned.

[PacificNW]

Wil,
help me out here. Why don't you just sell then since you seem so bleak on AMRN's future because it doesn't produce the product. BTW where I come from in business when one has the rights and contracts everything out you end up having so much less risk, less expenses , less capital tied up etc etc. Then add the war chest that they have in the bank and that allows them to never be negatively influenced by any suppliers since if AMRN wanted could buy out any supplier/manufacturer. What a position to be in, and believe me their contractors know this and obey. You are in a free world or just have not looked under the hood of many companies over your life time. Be an auditor for a time and it will open your eyes.
IE get out from behind the desk and go out into the world and really see what goes on in business. The computer handicaps people stopping them from seeing and experiencing what really goes on.