News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Hunter6110

12/03/06 12:04 PM

#138778 RE: vozmil #138777

Your completly insane, he did not/could not prove the bonds because he does not have then, or the amount he clames to have...Have you look at what CSHD lets recap...19 bond intrest at 1,000 pr intrest that comes up to 19,000, I thought Rufus said he had what 5 billion...LOL
icon url

Investorman

12/03/06 12:05 PM

#138779 RE: vozmil #138777

You seem to be confused about what has transpired.

RPH hasn't presented any case in court. He didn't even respond, which is why he is in default. He hasn't submitted any proof that he owns or has control of the bonds. There has been no hearing.

The court has made no decision. Trading resumed after 10 days because that is what the law mandates.
icon url

The Real Deal

12/03/06 12:06 PM

#138780 RE: vozmil #138777

This has been one lie or broken promise after another. Do you really not see that? Each time you people have some way to make things look good for yourselves. Give me one promise that has been fulfilled.
icon url

lithe lassie

12/03/06 12:06 PM

#138781 RE: vozmil #138777

Voz-what part of the court didn't "allow" trading don't you understand.
icon url

janice shell

12/03/06 8:34 PM

#138913 RE: vozmil #138777

RPH opted to present his case in the court of law since he refused to submit the proof of bonds with SEC based on his grievance against SEC.

No he didn't. The SEC opted to sue him.