News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sts66

11/14/19 12:35 PM

#225845 RE: studythosestocks #225837

No primary on label would be a crime - don't forget Dr. Brinton's brilliant statement - they can't possibly vote no primary on label unless they're idiots, which at least one of them appears to be.

Conversation I do NOT want to have with my patients:
“Sorry Mr. Jones, I can’t treat you till after your heart attack. Then, if you’re still alive I can treat you, OK?”


icon url

jessellivermore

11/14/19 12:42 PM

#225853 RE: studythosestocks #225837

studyTS....

I think this is one of these AdComs where the FDA takes charge and simply ignores the panel...The subject is too complex...and the panel is not intelligent, sophisticated, or knowledgeable enough to make an informed decision...

FDA will understand the the stat argument supports primaries at risk...and the necessity to lower their numbers before they become secondaries...

The panel is one antagonist (a bomb thrower) and a bunch of mentally challenged MDs..I think the Tufts guy is going to pay for this down the line when he gets to be the guy who voted against Vascepa...

":>) JL