Also - I want to mention we took a controlling interest in the Nutribrands, meaning we exchanged capital for profit. We did not acquire any additional liabilities or assets that would require us to spend money -- very much like the french dry deal!
Actually, what we did - based on Marks email to me - is Nutribrands needed some revolving credit so they could expand their shipment capabilities so we said "you can use ours" in exchange for some profit.
No dilution, performance based, no liabilities, no assets requiring additional capital or overhead. Pure profit --- WHAT ELSE DO YA"LL WANT??...o maybe it to be directly tied into Garnocks business endeavors....o wait, you have that here too! smh!