Replies to post #180583 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[jrs5]

Aha, very good catch Josh, that is in fact 106C (Nb) in Table 1.
So it looks like Apple, post CIP, is looking at 106C!
This is excellent news for LQMT!

[jrs5]

Josh, are there two different variants of 106C? One with Rhenium (Re) and one without? Or does 106C not contain Rhenium (Re)?
Li's presentation at one point showed Rhenium (Re) in 106C.

[PayMEmf]

SHUT THE FRONT DOOR!!

“[0097] Several metallic glasses were molded by the method disclosed above and demonstrate that the fine texture was replicated from the glass mold. For example, Zr-based metallic glasses, e.g. Zr.sub.70Cu.sub.13Ni.sub.9.9Al.sub.3.7Nb.sub.3.4, Zr.sub.67Ti.sub.8.8Ni.sub.9.8Cu.sub.10.6Be.sub.3.8, and Zr.sub.41Ti.sub.14Cu.sub.12Ni.sub.10Be.sub.23, were tested for trials. Pt-based metallic glass, such as Pt.sub.57.3Cu.sub.14.7Ni.sub.5.3P.sub.22.7, was also tested for trials. “

Good eye josh!!

[jaybiscuit]

Omg that’s big time info—thanks Josh!

[Pollux]

LiquidMetal name however is not part of MTA since 106 is not part of CIP.

From 2018 10K: https://liquidmetal.gcs-web.com/static-files/483f213f-9c2a-4c9e-9d21-009b3ffe026d

As a result, we will not pursue application of our bulk Liquidmetal alloys in the consumer electronics field. However, we continue to work with Apple to develop and advance research and development in the amorphous alloy space to benefit both consumer and non-consumer electronics fields.

106 continues to be a material with unknown origin
The PLA specifically mentions NO CE
The 10k from LQMT has specifically and outright said that LQMT will not be in the CE business.


Questions:

1. If you are management, and would be able to see a vision for revenue from CE, wouldn't your statement be a bit different?

2. Why would LQMT specifically continue to say NO CE - yet some here continue to say the opposite?

3. All this research is great but without a CEO or company that wants LQMT to benefit from CE, the statements would be different, no?

The statement does relate that the research with Apple will do two things:

A) The work will benefit CE (but LQMT has no rights to CE)
B) The work will benefit Non-CE (LQMT has rights to this space)


When a JDA is signed, which talks CE, then my mind will open up. Until then, CE is just a Segway to tangible LQMT markets which is a good thing.

The CE market is Li's(Chinas)!