Replies to post #179592 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[PatentGuy1]

So when you were having private conversations with LQMT employees about 106c, you didn’t ask whether it was jointly developed by LQMT and Eontec or LQMT and Yihao or by all three? I’m just confused by your other post.

If 106c is truly a joint entity between LQMT and Yihao (not Eon)

post#179242, https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150956294

[Pollux]

I may be on ignore, and that’s okay..but here is the bone of the meat..

1. Which company(ies) developed 106c?
2. ASUS is marketing liquid metal, perhaps in the China to English translation, it’s not Luiquidmetal; however, with that said, videos of ASUS employees showing ASUS camera use the term”liquid metal”, which would not be allowed since ASUS doesn’t have the right to use the term? Can you help clarify LQMTs position on the use of the name and protecting of its brand?
3. Is Eontec manufacturing the camera housing for ASUS?
4. If Eontec is mfg camera housing, then what alloy is being used? Is it a material under the PLA? And what exact material is it? If not, why isn’t that material in the PLA? (And I would follow up with, if this material wasn’t in the PLA, then why not?)
5. If it is under the PLA, and LQMT is to get revenue, where is the JDA?

When you get those answers let’s talk...until then there is nothing but speculating on words and twists- the LQMT side is just copy/paste, lawyer approved!!

[PatentGuy1]

To any sincere iHoppers that have PM capablity, who aren't ignored, and who learn anything of value, please share as much as possible without identifying the source, e.g., the source was a highly placed LQMT employee versus being on the janitorial staff.